Don Gray Don Gray's Profile Page

Don Gray Don Gray

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Relevant Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Answers - Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials

The next step to do is to take Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate. These Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice questions can help you measure your skill to see if it has already met the standard set by Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate. To optimize the effectiveness, We have made the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Test using the same format as the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam. All Databricks Exam Dumps questions appearing on the mock test are the ones we carefully predicted to appear on your upcoming exam.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.

Topic 2

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

Topic 3

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

>> Relevant Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Answers <<

Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Online

For candidates who are going to buy the exam dumps for the exam, the quality must be one of the most standards while choosing the exam dumps. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps are high quality and accuracy, since we have a professional team to research the first-rate information for the exam. We have reliable channel to ensure that Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Materials you receive is the latest one. We offer you free update for one year, and the update version for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials will be sent to your automatically. We have online and offline service, and if you have any questions for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps, you can consult us.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q18-Q23):

NEW QUESTION # 18
A Generative Al Engineer is deciding between using LSH (Locality Sensitive Hashing) and HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) for indexing their vector database Their top priority is semantic accuracy Which approach should the Generative Al Engineer use to evaluate these two techniques?

A. Compare the Recall-Onented-Understudy for Gistmg Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
B. Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
C. Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs
D. Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task is to choose between LSH and HNSW for a vector database index, prioritizing semantic accuracy.
The evaluation must assess how well each method retrieves semantically relevant results. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs
* Cosine similarity measures semantic closeness between vectors, directly assessing retrieval accuracy in a vector database. Comparing returned results' embeddings to test inputs' embeddings evaluates how well LSH or HNSW preserves semantic relationships, aligning with the priority.
* Databricks Reference:"Cosine similarity is a standard metric for evaluating vector search accuracy"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* BLEU evaluates text generation (e.g., translations), not vector retrieval accuracy. It's irrelevant for indexing performance.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU applies to generative tasks, not retrieval"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Compare the Recall-Oriented-Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* ROUGE is for summarization evaluation, not vector search. It doesn't measure semantic accuracy in retrieval.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is unsuited for vector database evaluation"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs
* Levenshtein distance measures string edit distance, not semantic similarity in embeddings. It's inappropriate for vector-based retrieval.
* Databricks Reference: No specific support for Levenshtein in vector search contexts.
Conclusion: Option A (cosine similarity) is the correct approach, directly evaluating semantic accuracy in vector retrieval, as recommended by Databricks for Vector Search assessments.

NEW QUESTION # 19
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

A. Use a smaller embedding model to generate
B. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi
C. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
D. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
E. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

NEW QUESTION # 20
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?

A. Split articles by 10 day blocks and return the block closest to the query.
B. pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles.
C. Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index.
D. Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.

NEW QUESTION # 21
Which TWO chain components are required for building a basic LLM-enabled chat application that includes conversational capabilities, knowledge retrieval, and contextual memory?

A. React Components
B. External tools
C. (Q)
D. Vector Stores
E. Conversation Buffer Memory
F. Chat loaders

Answer: D,E

Explanation:
Building a basic LLM-enabled chat application with conversational capabilities, knowledge retrieval, and contextual memory requires specific components that work together to process queries, maintain context, and retrieve relevant information. Databricks' Generative AI Engineer documentation outlines key components for such systems, particularly in the context of frameworks like LangChain or Databricks' MosaicML integrations. Let's evaluate the required components:
* Understanding the Requirements:
* Conversational capabilities: The app must generate natural, coherent responses.
* Knowledge retrieval: It must access external or domain-specific knowledge.
* Contextual memory: It must remember prior interactions in the conversation.
* Databricks Reference:"A typical LLM chat application includes a memory component to track conversation history and a retrieval mechanism to incorporate external knowledge"("Databricks Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Evaluating the Options:
* A. (Q): This appears incomplete or unclear (possibly a typo). Without further context, it's not a valid component.
* B. Vector Stores: These store embeddings of documents or knowledge bases, enabling semantic search and retrieval of relevant information for the LLM. This is critical for knowledge retrieval in a chat application.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector stores, such as those integrated with Databricks' Lakehouse, enable efficient retrieval of contextual data for LLMs"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* C. Conversation Buffer Memory: This component stores the conversation history, allowing the LLM to maintain context across multiple turns. It's essential for contextual memory.
* Databricks Reference:"Conversation Buffer Memory tracks prior user inputs and LLM outputs, ensuring context-aware responses"("Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* D. External tools: These (e.g., APIs or calculators) enhance functionality but aren't required for a basicchat app with the specified capabilities.
* E. Chat loaders: These might refer to data loaders for chat logs, but they're not a core chain component for conversational functionality or memory.
* F. React Components: These relate to front-end UI development, not the LLM chain's backend functionality.
* Selecting the Two Required Components:
* Forknowledge retrieval, Vector Stores (B) are necessary to fetch relevant external data, a cornerstone of Databricks' RAG-based chat systems.
* Forcontextual memory, Conversation Buffer Memory (C) is required to maintain conversation history, ensuring coherent and context-aware responses.
* While an LLM itself is implied as the core generator, the question asks for chain components beyond the model, making B and C the minimal yet sufficient pair for a basic application.
Conclusion: The two required chain components areB. Vector StoresandC. Conversation Buffer Memory, as they directly address knowledge retrieval and contextual memory, respectively, aligning with Databricks' documented best practices for LLM-enabled chat applications.

NEW QUESTION # 22
When developing an LLM application, it's crucial to ensure that the data used for training the model complies with licensing requirements to avoid legal risks.
Which action is NOT appropriate to avoid legal risks?

A. Only use data explicitly labeled with an open license and ensure the license terms are followed.
B. Use any available data you personally created which is completely original and you can decide what license to use.
C. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.
D. Reach out to the data curators directly before you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: When using data to train a model, it's essential to ensure compliance with licensing to avoid legal risks. Legal issues can arise from using data without permission, especially when it comes from third-party sources.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Reaching out to data curatorsbeforeusing the data is an appropriate action. This allows you to ensure you have permission or understand the licensing terms before starting to use the data in your model.
* Option B: Usingoriginal datathat you personally created is always a safe option. Since you have full ownership over the data, there are no legal risks, as you control the licensing.
* Option C: Using data that is explicitly labeled with an open license and adhering to the license terms is a correct and recommended approach. This ensures compliance with legal requirements.
* Option D: Reaching out to the data curatorsafteryou have already started using the trained model isnot appropriate. If you've already used the data without understanding its licensing terms, you may have already violated the terms of use, which could lead to legal complications. It's essential to clarify the licensing termsbeforeusing the data, not after.
Thus,Option Dis not appropriate because it could expose you to legal risks by using the data without first obtaining the proper licensing permissions.

NEW QUESTION # 23
......

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions can meet your needs to the maximum extent, and our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials are designed to the greatest extent from the customer's point of view. So you don't have to worry about the operational complexity. As soon as you enter the learning interface of our system and start practicing our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials on our Windows software, you will find small buttons on the interface. It is very easy and convenient to use and find.

Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials: https://www.crampdf.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam-prep-dumps.html

Don Gray Don Gray

Biography

Subscribe

All Access Membership